Crime in the Perception of Right-wing Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 2000 words

Crime in the Perception of Right-wing - Essay Example Right-wing criminologists fears the uncertainty of criminal behavior on the ground of racism, ethnicity and inequality and labels crime on the basis of social settings. While it is certainly true that right-wing political efforts are not always vague to obey traditional values, it does not follow that right-wing promotes fundamental school of thoughts in ceasing crime. In the course of this paper, we will discuss critically on what grounds crime spreads malaise and to what extent right wing draws a distinct line between causes and efforts to control crime and right-wing criminologist and the moralist. This will be further analysed in the light of critical criminological theory, which elaborate and assesses various efforts done in order to prevent crime. The rest of the analysis will critically analyse right-wing perspectives on violence, thereby locating the roots of criminality in the individual. This analysis will center around the realist aspect of the right-wing criminologists, t hat categorise crime under the heading of 'right realism' and relates more to a realistic view about the causes of crime and deviance than to a particular set of methodological principles. Right-wing criminologists, being strictly conservative perceive criminality in the context of those attempts that control and prevent criminal behavior. Therefore they possess the opinion that suggests solutions to the crime problem as couched in terms of a clear distinction between criminals and non-criminals, such that the behavior of the former has to be visualised as punishable. The contemporary economic and political scenario of any society reveals the extent to which most people are law-abiding and some criminals experience fear and predict an anticipated economic collapse among individuals, during times of economic uncertainty. Since right-wing never consider the economic consequences as the causes to spread crime, they perceive crime as policy-oriented institution which works in the absence of common culture and ethics. While blaming that criminals are due to our permissive social policies that allow unnecessary freedom to our society, they blame immigrants solely responsible for spreading malaise. The claim that right-wing conservatives believe that individuals are solely responsible for their acts and must be punished accordingly, arise two notions. First, that individuals are the cause of events that effect them, and secondly, the fact that individuals are responsible for making the most of the situation, in which they find themselves suitable to commit any crime. This explanation fits into the 'non-native' immigrants' who, robs the social sector from white-collar jobs and social security. Right-wing explanations about crime includes social policies which provides the right-wing thinkers an edge to contemplate upon the notion that by invariably attaching considerable weight to changes in social conditions as methods of 'reducing' crime, we are able to cease crime. Now, 'reducing' crime refers to 'reducing' the number of foreign immigrants to a country, i.e., to strict the

Fordism and Post-Fordism as Theories of Work Organisation Essay

Fordism and Post-Fordism as Theories of Work Organisation - Essay Example 54-55), it was not until over twenty years later that the term Fordism came into being. Antonio Gramsci, an Italian Communist imprisoned by Mussolini from 1926 to 1937 (Slattery, 1991, p. 125), authored the article 'Americanism and Fordism' in 1931. In this stinging critique of capitalism, he breaks down the fundamental changes occurring to the characteristics of labour. For 'the purpose of American society-developing in the worker to the highest degree automatic and mechanical attitudes, breaking up the old psycho-nexus of qualified professional work and reducing productive operations exclusively to the mechanical, physical aspect' (Gramsci, 1931, p. 290). Generally, Fordism is defined by standardisation of labour and components, usage of the assembly line, strict specialisation of semi-skilled labour and high production levels. This mass manufacturing depended on a stable economy and a predictable mass consumerism, for 'without the mass consumption of mass-produced products, companies would quickly go bankrupt' (O'Donnell, 1997, p. 252). The fundamental need for so many consumers led to the development of widespread advertising (Kirby et al, 2000, p. 340). Yet what distinguishes this paradigm shift is, as Gramsci noted above, the removal of decision-making power from the worker. A relative contemporary of Ford, Frederick Taylor, proposed that all mental activity should be removed from the factory floor so workers could almost become machines, with their pay tied to personal productivity (O'Donnell, 1997, p. 288). Fordism meant great homogeny, efficiency and output, which in turn meant greater prosperity. However, the strict division of labour created an unmotivated work force increasingly alienated from management. Competitive pay was not sufficient to stop the rapid turnover, and the growth of unions such as Industrial Workers of the World during this period attests to this dissatisfaction (Grint, 1998, p. 284). Additionally, Fordism needed a reliable economy and consumer base-this is illustrated by the number of companies, such as Ford, which only survived the American Great Depression due to large scale government intervention (O'Donnell, 1997, p. 252). Another factor is that drastic increases in productivity of the first stage of Fordism were unique-subsequent changes were less effective, for 'there was a finite limit to, or at least declining return from, the extent to which time and motion studies etc. could increase productivity' (Grint, 1998, p. 284). Once an entire industry converted, it became difficult to continue finding significant ways to heighten productivity and furt her decrease costs. Eventually these disadvantages, along with the rise of a new type of mass consumerism, would set the stage for the conditions the next theory of work organisation is based upon-Post-Fordism. As technological advances and consumer wants became more varied, a new theory of work organisation was proposed in The Second Industrial Divide by Michael Piore and Charles Sabel in 1984. Responding to the economic downturn of the 1970's and the limitations of mass production (Kirby et al, 2000, p. 340), they held that a new system was coming into being, motivated by increasing consumer demand for specialised